A coach who prefers strategies and direction is likely using which coaching style?

In coaching, a coach who prefers strategies and direction typically embodies an autocratic coaching style. This style is characterized by a clear hierarchy with the coach making the majority of the decisions and providing guidance based on their expertise. An autocratic coach often sets specific goals, outlines the means to achieve them, and expects athletes to follow instructions without much input or discussion. This approach can be effective in scenarios where quick decisions are required or when a team needs a strong, decisive leader.

In contrast, the other styles differ significantly in their approach to decision-making and athlete involvement. For example, collaborative coaching involves working together with athletes to develop strategies and decisions, promoting input from team members rather than solely directing them. Democratic coaching encourages participatory decision-making, allowing athletes to express their opinions and actively engage in the process. Transformational coaching focuses on inspiring and motivating athletes to reach their potential, building relationships based on trust and emotional support rather than simply providing directives. Each of these styles has its merits, but they do not align with a coach who prefers a structured and directive approach like that of an autocratic style.